Friday, September 1, 2017
Advanced Holster Snatch ‘N Grab V1 Modular Loadout Panel
I received this to T&E from Advanced Holsters. I had previously only used one of their products, the first generation ALG 6 Second Mount Glock Holster. My impression of that product was that it was good quality, but not the greatest design. aThe Snatch ‘N Grab on the other hand, showed more effort and work was placed in the design and production. The panel is modular, well built and versatile for both backpack and non bag carry.
The Snatch ‘N Grab is a “L” shaped panel of kydex with the following specifications:
16"L x 10"W with a 2.375" Bottom Flange
Made From 0.125" Black Kydex
MOLLE/PALS Compatible Grid Pattern
Nylon Grab Handle and 5 Foot Accessory Straps with Mil Spec Hardware
All Cutouts and Edges are Rounded to Prevent Frayed Webbing/Material
Made in the USA!
My preferred way to discretely carry a rifle is a LAW folder equipped SBR in a Vertx Gamut Plus backpack. The downside to carrying a rifle like this, is that the muzzle can poke down into the bottom of the back which upsets its ability to sit upright. The Snatch ‘N Grab panel prevented the layout from being an issue all while adding the ability to organize the interior with MOLLE pouches.
Up front, I expected that the Kydex would break along the L angle/fold. I was impressed that having used this since March, there are no breaks in the Kydex. having a hard angle folded into it along with the pressure on it from being roughly treated when I set my pack down in a hurry.
About 4 months into use, I rearranged the pouch setup on the Snatch ‘N Grab panel. It was simple to do even with using two different width PALS pouches. One was the weird off centered 7 or 8 channel wide Paraclete Med/Firing Systems pouch and the other a 6 PALS wide Blue Force Gear Triple M4. Due to the spacing on the Panel, I was able to work both pouches on the panel.
I didn’t use this as a vehicle insert, but can see how it would work as one should I need to in the future. Simply carry a duffle bag with panel out to vehicle to keep items out of plain view. Open duffel bag, remove panel, attach panel to seat back using included QD nylon straps. Do your tasks throughout the day with trauma kits, food, binoculars, etc. easily accessible. Get to a position you need to leave the vehicle, remove panel, back in duffle bag go on with life.
Wednesday, May 24, 2017
Semper Paratus Arms 2 Day Armorer Course
May 16/17, 2017
Greater Seattle, WA area
Instructor: William Larson
I had seen the announcement for this course by watching Will Larson’s company’s posts on Facebook.
I was paying attention to this and was in the process of fitting it into my schedule when I saw that Primary & Secondary had a free slot giveaway in the class for LE. Somehow, I was blessed to win the free slot. Thanks to Larson and P&S for the opportunity.
The course was different in the description from other AR-15 specific armorer classes I’d looked at attending. How so you may ask? The instructor has the student bring their own or department issued AR-15 pattern rifle to the class. The others I’d seen, you just bring the required tools and a rifle is provided. It became evident the advantage of bringing rifles to the class as the 2 days progressed.
The day started off with an overview of Larson’s background and what gave him his knowledge. I had followed Larson from his posts on M4Carbine.net back in that forums heyday as “IraqGunz” where he posted many pictures of the problems with assorted guns sold as “Milspec” yet failing to be close. (For those lacking critical thinking abilities, that is as close as they can be to Milspec absent a full auto switch.) This class was all Direct Impingement gas system focused.
After establishing the “why you should listen,” the course purpose and terminology was defined. Next up was called “Establishing the Standard.” This was explaining “MilSpec” and what that means. During this entire portion, the instructor was bringing up many AR-15 weapon myth’s such as “jamming,” “Milpsec sucks,” gas rings must be aligned to work,” “staking of the carrier key and castle nut is overrated,” etc..., and then debunking them.
A common myth is that “Milspec means lowest bidder.” Larson explained that while this was technically true, it implies something that isn’t true. What is implied is that lowest bidder equals junk. Lowest bidder equals “junk” in word association. What does lowest bidder mean in association with government contracts? Lowest bidder who states they will produce/provide what the contract description asks for. So a US MIlitary issued MilSpec M4/M4A1 Carbine (Colt or FN manufacture), doesn’t mean its “junk” as the contract price for a M-4 Carbine is anywhere from $500-600 per, compared to a Bushmaster of similar listed specs at $800. Cost alone isn’t an indicator of quality. Quality is based on the parts and way they are built.
The reason one should be familiar with the MilSpec standards, is to know what a product’s specifications should be and that there is a reason for parts to be what they are. Larson showed examples of guns from his personal armorer experiences as well as student guns from past classes. The best part was getting to look at the guns brought to class, both personally purchased and issued duty guns. Seeing the results of doing homework before purchasing a gun and how this usually avoids having a gun with problems.
First thing we looked at in the gun, was the BCG. During the history of the BCG the instructor covered the precursor to the AR-15, the AR-10. The AR-10 was built by Armalite, a division of the Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corporation. Getting to see the history of rifle parts was very interesting to someone who is into history and therefore likes to know why we are where we are today. This showed how things have changed for the better as specifications where changed.
BCG’s must be staked, no room for discussion. Understanding that the spec’s show such a low torque value for the screws that hold the carrier key in, and how easy it was to break the torque, it drove home the importance of proper staking. A MOACKS was used to fix staking on BCG’s that were fixable in class. It was interesting that the carriers that weren’t staked properly generally had non-quality/spec screws in them as well. Having a BCG with poor staking and some aftermarket coatings prevented some BCG’s from being staked. Staking something that was already coated would of have fractured the coating which could lead to eventual peeling or flaking over time. This was something one should consider before they purchase a coated BCG – make sure its staked properly or you will be SOL for the cost of getting it coated.
The AR-15 family in common use today, is not the same as originally built (20” barrel with 1/12 twist and rifle stock). The AR-15 family today is really a gun limited by imagination and parts. No other rifle has truly answered the designers’ goal of “weapon system” that the AR-15 family has become. With the adaptability of the gun, comes issues though.
The Milspec for gas ports was the next topic. Rifle length gas, carbine gas, buffers, etc. all play factors. The right size gas port is very important and must be in place for a gun to function correctly. AR-15’s DI gas systems require dwell time to both function and stabilize the bullet. Charts were showing to explain why some longer barrels have smaller gas ports, while others have larger. This variance in size was due to the length of gas system – from carbine, midlength to rifle. Also discussed were some manufactures proprietary gas systems and the downside of that – parts availability.
Larson gave an example on why both knowing and following the spec by explaining, the MK18. The MK18 is a very misunderstood gun, although its understanding is increasing as time progresses. The MK18 is a Crane built gun for the Navy based on a specific request. Take the standard M4 carbine, make it as short as possible for ship operations yet still work with the standing SOPMOD accessories including the SOPMOD can which at the time was the KAC QDSS suppressor. When this was done, Crane was taking M4 Carbines in service and cutting the barrel down. This resulted in 10.3” barrel, which was the shortest possible combination of the carbine gas system and the KAC suppressor mount. Next up was making the gas system work, which was done by progressively enlarging the gas port until the gun ran both suppressed and unsuppressed. This resulted in a larger gas port that works with Milspec ammunition. The MK18 has been copied by many companies and “clone” builders. Sadly, most of them are not anywhere close to the spec.
The FSB and gas blocks were next. Larson explained how a FSB is spaced for the front handguard cap. If you remove the FSB to install a low profile gas block, most of the time a gas block is secured with set screws, not pins. Also covered was materials used – don’t use aluminum for example.
Chamber’s were covered – including what is a 5.56, .223 and .223 Wylde. The reality is, most companies that don’t follow the spec list they claim to follow, also don’t have a 5.56 chamber even when they market it as such. A 5.56 chamber reamer was shown and how to use it. Larson used this on a couple different 5.56 marked barrels in the class, which by this point based on the manufacturer of the guns, didn’t surprise the students.
Day 2 was short on powerpoint and long on the hands on work of tearing the rest of the rifle down. We took our rifles other than barrel, gas block/tube, and rail. We took lower receivers apart and parts of the upper. The parts that were not taken out, were shown how to install or replace. The course didn’t call for tearing barrels out, but students who wished to did get to have their rifle taken down for fixing things such as receiver extension staking, barrel replacement, gas tube alignment, barrel nut replacement etc.
It was interesting to see the guns students brought to work on. Some were put together with good parts by people who did the install correctly. Others were not. Those rifles were great examples of why things must be done correctly. From set screw gas blocks with no dimples so they were misaligned, to UTG parts being used by someone.
This is my first AR-15 armorer course, so I’m curious what other classes would teach. That said, I felt that by having the background of working on a litany of AR-15’s in his career and the course having a variety of AR-15’s in it I gained much more than working on a stock Colt 6920 style carbine for two days. None of my AR-15’s are “stock” so learning about the stuff to look for in buying, building or inspecting a rifle with parts that are performance or fight enhancing makes this worth it.
*** No dremel tools were used in the class, thankfully. ***
Wednesday, February 8, 2017
Vertx EDC Gamut Plus
I’ve been using this pack for over approximately 1 ¾ of a year so far. It’s been my mostly daily carry/use pack, also hauling lots of stuff on family hikes, trips to the range, travel, etc.
I first was interested in this pack when I was hunting down an easy way to “EDC” a rifle “Every Day Carbine” to quote Victory First. I was looking for a backpack that was big enough to hold a rifle, yet look like a normal backpack while still having space for items in addition to the rifle. The backpack had to look like it belonged in normal daily carry. The backpack needed enough space to have the rifle, as well as items that would make the pack blend in – snacks, water, books, coats, etc. The backpack couldn’t be the size of a 45 liter backpacking pack either. The Vertx Gamut looked like it might fit that role, but the OAL of the Gamut precluded a 10.5” SBR with LAW folder from fitting well, if at all. The Gamut Plus is 24” high, whereas the Gamut is 22” high.
Through Matt Jacques of Victory Group I was fortunate to meet one of the VERTX executives. He was able to provide me with a Gamut Plus to use in my search for a rifle carrying capable pack. I have been using this pack since last summer 2015.
*Cool photo of the Gamut Plus in use from the VERTX facebook page*
The pack has been used to haul the typical “stuff” around, but allows me to easily carry my SBR around without it being obvious what is in there. The layout of the pack allows me to carry a sizeable amount of equipment as well as the rifle. Seen here is the rifle with a OR dry bag showing the size available.
I use this to haul range gear at times, using the beavertail flap to easily strap in a helmet with NOD mount. I can carry a SBR, PVS-14 and Helmet to make transit for range sessions smooth. For someone working in a low profile role where a rifle and night fighting capability are needed, this is an option – use other clothing, yoga mat, etc to cover up the helmet and nobody is the wiser.
This bag will barley fit in a Overhead bin or under the seat in commercial air traffic. When traveling with kids, a large pack you can stuff things into easily to make the transit through security as fast as possible is worth it. This pack size paid off when I flew to take VCQB last year and needed a place to carry my soft armor and JPC. I was able to carry this as a carry on, and despite the increased weight, it worked.
So far the only wear point has been one corner of the drag handle on the pack has come out of the stitching. The movement out of the stiching is less than half the total attachment, not even halfway. The stitching hasn’t torn more since I noticed it last spring, leading me to believe that by now its staying in place and not a concern.
The pack continues to perform well and should be considered if you need a larger day pack or a pack for carrying a rifle.
Thursday, February 2, 2017
Sheriff of Baghdad Concerned Citizen U Loop Adjustable 2 point Sling
I was sent this sling to test out and provide a review of. It’s the latest iteration of Shrek’s Sheriff of Baghdad "B" Sling. The base of this concept is the adjustable two point sling with built in attachment methods that should work with any rail or stock. This model utilizes the Blue Force Gear “U” loop. The “U” loop can attach to just about anything and is a bit of wizardry.
The adjustment method of the U loop sling differs from the standard SOB-B sling (which is similar to the VTAC, VCAS, Sierra, Magpul MS1). To use the U loop sling, you attach the sling at front and back. The tail on the adjustment end has a Velcro strap to keep it tied into the body of the sling. To set the sling up, you pull the logo end through the slide lock to the preferred “full extension” length. To tighten it, you pull the tailpiece from between secured end and the slide lock. Pressure pulling away from the slide lock will take up the tension tightening the sling and therefore the gun into your body.
Based on the previous experience where I had a sling start to come loose based on a old design, I made a point of doing lots of walking around with the rifle sling – not into Chipotle of course. While the rifle was slung, the slider mechanism didn’t come loose unless I made it.
For more info such as pricing and how to order check the sole source distributor of this model:
More on Shrek: sheriffofbaghdad.com
More on Shrek: sheriffofbaghdad.com
Wednesday, November 2, 2016
Hangers or Drop pouches
I have a Extreme Gear Labs med kit that is the “hanger” style that has been popular of late. The concept is to put a pouch that hangs below the front flap of a chest rig or plate carrier. I initially saw this in pictures of kit from around mid 2005 and on, when MIL assaulters were adding bangs, mags, IFAK’s etc on the groin armor flaps on heavy vests. Also something I saw was guys using fanny packs as IFAK's since it was below the Armor and yet centerline for ease of access and worked no matter if only wearing belt kit or with belt and amor. As the civilian market of selling gear went more towards selling chest rigs than PC’s/Armor Carriers, people started to see the cool guy gear and want something like it. If you need to add kit to what your wearing with minimal side print, a hanger makes that easy.
"Dalton Fury" RIP
Flap with Utility Pouch
Flap with Utility Pouch
Tom Spooner/Northern Red
Flap with flashbangs and mags
Flap with flashbangs and mags
For my use of a Hanger, I went with the EGL “FBI” mod med kit. My chest rig is limited to range days where I don’t need armor, or for “hey something’s going on but I don’t have my armor at home with me” wear. The chest rig is a EGL 3 Mag VOCR – reviewed on here already.
The FBI med kit has a front dual side opening Tourniquet pouch. It fits a CAT as well as SOFT-W gen2 and up. The back portion is a top zipper opening utility pouch. I have combat gauze, Z fold regular gauze and other standard IFAK contents in it. A person could use this for other roles, but that’s how I use it. To allow easier ID of the zippers, I replaced the supplied grey paracord pulls with glow in the dark blue.
Placement/Clearance. Body types and what other kit you are using with this will dictate how you wear your kit. One factor is that if the top of the top opening pouch butts up against the bottom of your chest rig, it will be really difficult to open the pouch when needed. I’ve adjusted the height a few times by moving the Velcro attached hanger up and down.
Tuesday, October 11, 2016
Sierra Tac 2 Point Adjustable Sling
I’ve had this sling on a rifle since early this year as a T&E at request of the owner/designer.
The Sierra Tac sling is similar to function with other 2 point adjustable slings on the market, except it has a adjustment slider that is made just for Sierra Tac. The adjuster is machined from a single billet of aluminum. Its made in America and sewn by Americans.
To use the sling, you simply attach it at your preferred forward and reward placement (2” behind the gas block of a Carbine length gas system and outside rear stock is my preference). To adjust sling tension, you grap the slider and move forward or backwards. While using the sling, I found that grabbing the whole slider mechanism makes it easier to loosen the sling. To tighten the sling, I grab the protruding part only. See below pictures for more detail on how. It adjusts very smoothly both in and out, a feature some 2 point slings do not have.
The length of the sling is perfect for my use, both in a neck loop or in a over/under shoulder method. I can adjust the sling for wear over a t-shirt, soft body armor, plate carrier or combination of the soft armor/PC. I don’t use padded slings unless worn without armor typically, due to armor negating the advantage of padding. Compared to other padded slings, the Sierra Tac is thin and light on padding, but as I said, I only need this when worn over a t-shirt. The amount of padding has felt perfectly comfortable no matter what the layers of clothing have been.
Downside. I’ve noticed a few times that the tension on the sling/adjuster has come loose and the sling has then gone to full extension. I cant duplicate this under intentional use on the range, dry practice, or house clearing. However, I have noticed that this is when the rifle is not in a use carry position, but more of an “admin” role like slung on my back while teaching. This has also happened when the rifle is sitting around (gun safe for example). In conversation with the designer and other users, it appears the reason for this is the following. When friction/pressure is applied on the sling, the slider is under friction based tension. This stops the sling from moving. Remove the pressure, it freely moves. This doesn’t make the sling impossible to adjust though when under pressure. The material is somewhat slick when new, which might contribute to this. The slider uses friction and tension to lock and unlock. Coarser webbing makes for a more locked feel for the sling adjustment. With the more locked feel it seems to make for a slightly more cumbersome adjustment.
Seen here in use:
After 6 months of use so far, The Sierra Tac 2 point sling has joined the very short list of slings I use.